Obama killed Christopher Stevens, Tyrone Woods, Glen Doherty and Sean Smith (the curiously forgotten man in the group). By that, I mean he either had these men assassinated or wittingly allowed their deaths. If you believe this is too strong a statement, when you become aware of the facts and put them into context, you will see how the pieces of this puzzle fit together quite nicely. Obama had the means, motive and opportunity to bust a move that would serve multiple purposes simultaneously . . . and cost only a few lives of people that the White House wanted to believe would be quickly forgotten.
It Started With A Gun Running Operation . . . And Staying Anonymous Was Important
Let’s begin with a story about Stevens running guns to Libya, a story that is cooking in the background but is talked about in many credible sources on the Internet. Here is just one such article: http://www.businessinsider.com/us-syria-heavy-weapons-jihadists-2012-10 Who would be in a better position than the American Ambassador to do this? Unless you are Pollyanna, you know that ambassadors are part of the intelligence service if called upon to act in that capacity. This is exactly when “diplomatic immunity” comes in handy.) Is this a real possibility? Haaaa. Is Obama Muslim?
What is the importance of the city of Benghazi? It is a seaport in Eastern Libya and the former home of a large military base which stored massive amounts of weaponry during Kadaffy’s rule. But during chaos in Libya, the Libyan military lost control of approximately 20,000 Russian-made surface-to-air missiles. http://www.rawstory.com/rawreplay/2011/09/20000-portable-surface-to-air-weapons-missing-in-libya/ They also lost control of caches of other heavy and light arms as well as the ammunition. Where did they go?
Nobody knows for sure the fate of all the Libyan weapons. But the idea that some of them could have end up in Syria is not a far stretch of the imagination. Remember what happened in mid-October? http://video.search.yahoo.com/search/video?p=syrian+rebels+shoot+down+helicopter. The Telegraph ran this story on October 17: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/middleeast/syria/9615306/Syrian-rebels-shoot-down-helicopter-in-Idlib.html Pollyanna is unaware of this country’s long history of running arms to foreign countries, but you aren’t. The practice did not start with Obama, but he has certainly raised it to a fine art, redefining the definition of executive arrogance in the process. Fast & Furious is just the most recent and public example of this practice . . . and it demonstrates how the Obama Regime is completely indifferent to the loss of life through actions that are negligent if not outright illegal. Two of those who lost their lives were Brian Terry and the forgotten Jaime Zapata. They were killed by Fast & Furious guns. Two hundred Mexicans were also killed in Mexico by the people who had been the recipients of guns the Holder Department of Justice allowed to “walk” south across the border. So there is certainly a precedent for Obama to use gun running as an instrument of policy.
Why Obama Would Prefer A Covert Operation
Obama could not afford to have his name associated with any questionable foreign policy decisions, particularly in the middle of an election campaign. But do you think for a minute that he would hesitate to use proxies to advance his political agenda . . . and here’s the good part . . . and do it in a way that would not require him to commit American lives and treasure? There would be no troops on the ground and maybe, just maybe, something good would happen and he could claim credit for it. Oh my. And think about this: If he could do it secretly so as not to have to take a fall if things went sour, don’t you think that would be the ultimate wet dream for this narcissistic sociopath? Remember that the Obama administration’s philosophy is to “never let a crisis go to waste.”
Other pluses arguing for a covert Obama arms running program include basic geography and convenience. Benghazi is only 969.0 miles (842.0 nautical miles) from the Turkish port of Iskenderun. This port is only 35 miles from the part of Syria in the part of the country dominated by Syrian rebels. FOX ran this story: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012/10/25/was-syrian-weapons-shipment-factor-in-ambassadors-benghazi-visit/ According to this article, “Al Entisar was carrying 400 tons of cargo. Some of it was humanitarian, but also reportedly weapons, described by the report as the largest consignment of weapons headed for Syria's rebels on the frontlines.”
Benghazi-To-Turkey Arms Shipment
The records obtained by FOX for the arms shipment story was gleaned from information they saw when inspecting shipping records in the port of Iskenderun. I am not certain what kind of security international ports have on such records, but I am reasonably certain that reporters are not routinely given access to such information . . . and isn’t it just a bit curious that FOX stumbled upon this information that most likely lies somewhere in a large database? Who gave FOX the tip? Personally, my bet is that it was a member of the same intelligence agencies that have been thrown under the Obama bus. These people are not happy. There are many more just like them in the military. Details are now starting to become a steady drip from both the intelligence community and the military. (Now, I’m having vivid memories of Watergate, for certain. This is how a major scandal always begins . . . the steady drip, drip, drip of damning information from inside sources. Oh yes. There are most certainly .) At any rate, unless you are Pollyanna, you probably also realize in cases such as this, the description of the items on the manifest may not be accurate. In fact, it is difficult to imagine any intelligence organization anywhere in the world actually telling the truth about what’s in those boxes that were sent from Libya to Turkey and thence to Syria?
Now consider the logistics of moving 400 tons of weapons to Syria. A semi-trailer will have a net load of just a bit more than 12 tons. That much freight requires more than 30 semi-trailers of materiel. These vehicles must be delivered on time and put on board a very large vessel in a busy port. This takes manpower and money. Do the various local militias in Libya have that kind of resources? No, they do not. Even an Obama White House would never allow Al Qaeda to ship arms from Libya to Turkey. So the list of suspects is down to a couple of possibilities: Israel and the U.S. Israel would never do that . . . and even Mossad would have great difficulty pulling it off. That leaves one suspect with the organizational skills and connections and the funds for the operation.
Patraeus Side Bar: Historic Irony
Side Bar ----> Here is an example of what I believe is providential irony. It’s not really part of the story of how Barack Obama murdered Chris Stevens. But it does provide some context regarding key personalities in this unfolding tragedy. Barack Obama appointed Davis Patreaus to Director of the Central Intelligence Agency. Politically . . . which is the only way Obama is capable of thinking . . . that was a very wise move. Patreaus is highly respected. He is a West Point graduate, in the top 5% of his class. He developed the blueprint for the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, giving his best advice, following orders from his civilian boss . . . as should be the case . . . understanding that he was mandated to fight politically correct wars instead of doing as he would have done had that not been the case. But maybe he also had political ambitions . . . and one way to neutralize him for awhile would be to ask him, as a patriot, if he would continue to serve, but in the capacity of CIA chief? And, if you are Obama, you believe that such an “honor” buys blind loyalty. Hell, politicians sell out all the time in Chicago for less than their honor. But the community organizer failed to understand the true nature of a man like Patreaus. They have honor. So not too surprisingly, “sources” informed FOX that the CIA denied they had stood in the way of assisting the four Americans killed in Libya. http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012/10/26/cia-operators-were-denied-request-for-help-during-benghazi-attack-sources-say/ Word like that is leaked from the agency . . . with explicit instructions from the Director . . . who will not be bought. Watch for lots more such stories. What is certain to me is that Obama cannot afford to fire Patreaus, but the Director was certainly “in the loop” on the video . . . and that will give Obama nightmares because he now realizes that if Patreus is ever called upon for testimony in front of Congress, he will give honest testimony that will speak to the issue of Obama’s dereliction of duty. Patreaus is not a Chicago thug politician and he cannot be bought.
Stevens Connection To Arms Shipment To Turkey
Getting back to how and why Stevens was killed, what did Stevens have to do with those weapons that were delivered to Turkey? According to FOX, “Although what was discussed at the meeting is not public, a source told Fox News that Stevens was in Benghazi to negotiate a weapons transfer, an effort to get SA-7 missiles out of the hands of Libya-based extremists. And although the negotiation said to have taken place may have had nothing to do with the attack on the consulate later that night or the Libyan mystery ship, it could explain why Stevens was travelling in such a volatile region on the 11th anniversary of the 9/11 attacks.” It is also possible that “an effort to get SA-7 missiles out of the hands of Libyan-based extremists” would be a great cover story. Alternatively, what if it was the truth? Furthermore, assuming that Stevens believed he had secured a large number of missiles in exchange for running guns to the Syrians, how the hell do you think that would play in Peoria . . . in an election year . . . if it came out? Do you think that sort of eventuality would be a fatal blow to Obama’s re-election efforts?
Why Woods And Doherty Ended Up In Benghazi
Consider this: In a very tightly run covert operation, it would be conceivable that an ambassador could be tasked with running guns in Libya. This is very dangerous work . . . and it was being performed in a chaotic environment. If his security detachment was being continuously downsized, it would be most reasonable to do what you could do to keep the cream of the crop . . . men like Tyrone Woods and Glen Doherty, “members of a Global Response Staff at a nearby CIA safehouse.” http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yIZKfx46Fm8 My guess, but it’s just a hunch, is that a “Global Response Staff” means “CIA operatives.” Obviously, the CIA was monitoring the events in real time . . . just as was Obama and his inner circle. They literally watched as the attack was in progress . . . in the same Situation Room they used on the night bin Laden was killed . . . only this time, they made history by refusing to save the lives of Americans in Benghazi who were pleading for help.
What Obama Would Have Us Believe
Obama would have us believe that the United States military is incapable of rapidly responding in emergencies such as these. Any fool should be able to see the falsity in that sort of explanation . . . but then, what good would eyes do to a liberal fool who would not see the truth standing in front of him anyway? Is it preposterous to believe that Obama felt his political stars had aligned perfectly on September 11? The goods had already been delivered to Turkey. No matter if there were missiles in the shipment or not, word of such an operation would sink Obama in this election. Chris Stevens and his security force were expendable. Was Obama forewarned of an attack? Damn it, how many times had they been attacked in the past? How many times had they been asked for more security? Who would literally watch real time video of four Americans being systematically attacked and, obviously in need of immediate assistance to save their mortal lives? That person would have to have some powerful motives . . . and be pretty certain he could handle any situation that might come up. Sound like anyone you know?
Benghazi Events Spun Out Of Control . . . And Wrecked A Good Plan
September 11, 2012, the events begin to unfold in Benghazi . . . with Stevens sending a request for more security early in the morning. The Annex where he died had been attacked two times in the past, on one occasion sustaining a hole in the perimeter wall I have seen described as “large enough for 40 men to walk through.” (Sorry, can’t find the article online. Knock yourself out.) Anyway, this shows one of the walls that had been breached on September 11: http://theconservativetreehouse.com/2012/10/14/the-benghazi-story-widens-the-official-state-department-version/ My point is, the compound was known to be a target, so the questions that many have raised regarding the issue of simply not honoring repeated requests for security . . . and even reducing the number of security staff assigned to protect Stevens. Wow. Why would it not be in your interest, as the president of the United States, to save American lives when it is within your power? A cynic would say that maybe it was another way Obama wanted to “make history.” Haaaaa. Anyway, it would certainly “be optimal” if a covert operation that was tightly held, known only to a small inner circle
Obama: Nothing To Lose, Much To Gain
The president had nothing to lose and everything to gain if he could literally bury the evidence pertaining to arms running. Would he risk something like that? Most likely, the only corroborating witnesses belong to an Islamist group who would have no credibility with most people. I think Obama has come to believe he is untouchable. His election was a fraud in the sense that we have really never known him. His failure to tell us who he really is, his ability to hide behind glib talk and a smile, is a sin of omission. But he was able to “shuck and jive,” as Sarah Palin described it so well, his way into the White House, also willing to actively misrepresent himself when necessary. That’s a double whammy, people. He’s a pro. He’s really good. He bested millions, but that’s history . . . that will not be repeated because things did not go as desired.
Events which seemed to be well “in hand” on the part of a complicit president spun out of control when a series of unanticipated things occurred. Somehow, in the early going of the battle in Benghazi, roughly 30 people were calling for assistance from the same building in which Stevens and the others lost their lives. Ooooops. That’s not optimal. Those people are potential witnesses to the debacle. As an aside, remember hearing about them? Who are they? What are they saying? Anyone hear anything about that? Don’t tell me they have been the victims of alien abduction! http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-18563_162-57539738/u.s-military-poised-for-rescue-in-benghazi/ These 30 people were saved when Woods and Doherty refused three direct orders to not engage those who were attacking our people.
Waiting On A Rooftop For Rescue: An American Hero Dies Because The Commander In Chief Found It Convenient
As fate would have it, both Woods and Doherty returned to Annex after saving the lives of people from whom we would all very much like to hear. Obama knew who was in that building when the attack was in progress. The failure to act in this manner, with events pertaining to life and death were being played out in real time in front of his eyes, is certainly without precedent. It cannot be explained away with trite phrases such as “we needed to get the facts,” or “we didn’t have the resources.” Tyrone Woods used his laser to light up one of the mortar positions that was attacking him while he manned a machine gun on the top of a building in a god-forsaken hell hole. It is very plausible that he was doing this not in a vain hope that air cover would arrive . . . but that it was, in fact, in overhead awaiting word from the Commander in Chief to save these American lives.
Just Another Conspiracy Theory?
So now, you’re thinking, “Whoever wrote this is insane. The president would never order or allow the deaths of American citizens” . . . until they search back in their not-so-distant memory. If that is what you are thinking, you may have a point. However, remember that Obama called the tragedy in Benghazi “bumps in the road” that were “not optimal.” So if he did not order the deaths of those who died, if he did not actively seek to have them killed, does it really matter? They are still dead.
This is what I contend. Obama sat down in that Situation Room with his advisers, watched the play-by-play in real time, got up at some point, ate dinner, went to bed so that he could get up early the next day and go to a fund raiser in Las Vegas. Obama, either by a sin of commission or omission, failed to honor his oath as Commander in Chief. As a result, Americans died in Benghazi. If we are so unfortunate as to have this despicable man re-elected to the White House, we may very well see impeachment proceedings being next year as the facts continue to come out. When some second rate burglars broke into Watergate, a corrupt president was re-elected but was later thrown out of office. It could happen that way again, but maybe the American voter has wised up since 1972 . . . maybe not. For sure, we cannot afford to have that scenario played out again . . . not with our economy on the brink of collapse. The big question that remains unanswered why Obama failed to send military assistance for heroes who had saved so many lives. Don’t look for any answer’s coming from the Anointed One’s lips. After the election, I believe we will soon see bumper stickers reading “Stevens Died . . . And THEN Obama Lied.”